MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652747311 · doi:10.1142/s1793525317500042

Balanced presentations of the trivial group and four-dimensional geometry

2016· article· en· W1652747311 on OpenAlexaff
Boris Lishak, Alexander Nabutovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Topology and Analysis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsGroup (periodic table)CodimensionIsometry (Riemannian geometry)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Pure mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove that: (1) There exist infinitely many nontrivial codimension one “thick” knots in [Formula: see text]; (2) For each closed four-dimensional smooth manifold [Formula: see text] and for each sufficiently small positive [Formula: see text] the set of isometry classes of Riemannian metrics with volume equal to [Formula: see text] and injectivity radius greater than [Formula: see text] is disconnected; and (3) For each closed four-dimensional [Formula: see text]-manifold [Formula: see text] and any [Formula: see text] there exist arbitrarily large values of [Formula: see text] such that some two triangulations of [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] simplices cannot be connected by any sequence of [Formula: see text] bistellar transformations, where [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] times).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Topology and AnalysisSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207