MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1652860189 · doi:10.1109/izsbc.2002.991760

Turbo decoding with erasures for high-speed transmission in the presence of impulse noise

2003· article· en· W1652860189 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Zhang, Abbas Yongaçoğlu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTurbo codeImpulse noiseTurbo equalizerConcatenated error correction codeDecoding methodsErasureTurboSerial concatenated convolutional codesImpulse (physics)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmBlock codeEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If impulse noise is not taken into account, turbo codes are highly attractive for transmissions over asymmetric digital subscriber lines. We show that impulse noise could devastate turbo coding performance if appropriate precautions are not taken. A possible solution of using an outer Reed-Solomon code to combat impulse noise results in very large delays. We propose erasure turbo decoding to improve the turbo trellis coded modulation performance against impulse noise. We also show that when a concatenated coding structure is employed, in addition to improving the bit error rate performance, erasure turbo decoding can also significantly reduce the delay of the outer Reed-Solomon code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207