La « porte ouverte d'IBM » au service de la gestion des ressources humaines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le programme dit de la « porte ouverte » d’IBM propose aux salariés de l’entreprise, en cas de conflit individuel avec leur supérieur hiérarchique, de recourir à un dispositif particulier de médiation/arbitrage interne. Cet article montre que ce mode original de résolution des conflits – peu courant en France – est source de justice procédurale et d’amélioration du climat social au sein de l’entreprise, malgré les inquiétudes qu’il peut susciter. Quoi qu’il en soit, le sentiment des salariés vis-à-vis de la « porte ouverte » est très sensible à l’information dont ils disposent, ce qui met l’accent sur l’importance de la communication autour de ce type de dispositif. La « porte ouverte » peut alors être considérée, au delà d’un mode de résolution des conflits, comme un outil de gestion des ressources humaines en tant que tel, favorisant la prise de parole et la responsabilisation des salariés au sein de l’entreprise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".