Agentes y sistemas alternativos de los halones utilizados en la extinción de incendios en instalaciones terrestres y en buques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1997 se firma bajo los auspicios del Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente, el protocolo de Montreal sobre limitacion de la produccion y consumo de algunas sustancias que danan la capa de ozono, en concreto sobre cinco clorofluorocarbonos (CFS'S) y tres halones, medidas que pronto son reforzadas en posteriores revisiones. La busqueda de sustancias o sistemas alternativos al uso de los halones empleados en la extincion de incendios, ha hecho que alguno de los agentes extintores tradicionales cobren una especial importancia. Las sustancias alternativas, tienen que ser idoneas para el uso al que vayan a ser destinadas y seguras para el medio ambiente y para las personas, con lo que las opciones alternativas a los halones quedan centradas en los agentes quimicos limpios y en los sistemas de agua nebulizada, fundamentalmente, y en plan mas experimental, en los sistemas de pequenas particulas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".