MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1655140071 · doi:10.1063/1.1483481

Shock Waves and Plasma Physics

2002· article· en· W1655140071 on OpenAlexaff
G. André Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShock wavePlasmaWarm dense matterPhysicsShock waves in astrophysicsShock (circulatory)IonizationWaves in plasmasAtomic physicsElectronThermal conductivityComputational physicsIonMechanicsNuclear physicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of shock wave on advances in plasma science is illustrated using studies of plasma conductivity, electron‐ion equilibration rate and pressure ionization. Conversely, these studies have led to the recognition of the non‐equilibrium thermal structure of a shock wave as well as the role plasma physics plays in the high‐pressure regime of shock physics. The convergence of the two fields also leads to the development of Warm Dense Matter science that incorporates the physics of high‐density plasmas, high‐temperature condensed matter and shock processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207