MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1655726838 · doi:10.4000/rhr.7652

Patricia Lavelle, Religion et histoire : sur le concept d’expérience chez Walter Benjamin

2010· article· fr· W1655726838 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l histoire des religions · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Sudbury
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage, issu d’une thèse doctorale dirigée par Heinz Wismann, dégage de manière convaincante une unité de dessein dans la pensée de Benjamin, par-delà ses différents stades et la diversité de ses genres discursifs. Cette unité consiste dans une compréhension autant que possible théologique de l’expérience historique. Cette précision : « autant que possible », est nécessaire puisque, de l’avis de Benjamin, l’histoire, et particulièrement celle de la modernité, se caractérise précisément p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it