MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1655726838 · doi:10.4000/rhr.7652

Patricia Lavelle, Religion et histoire : sur le concept d’expérience chez Walter Benjamin

2010· article· fr· W1655726838 on OpenAlexaff
Lucien Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l histoire des religions · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Sudbury
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage, issu d’une thèse doctorale dirigée par Heinz Wismann, dégage de manière convaincante une unité de dessein dans la pensée de Benjamin, par-delà ses différents stades et la diversité de ses genres discursifs. Cette unité consiste dans une compréhension autant que possible théologique de l’expérience historique. Cette précision : « autant que possible », est nécessaire puisque, de l’avis de Benjamin, l’histoire, et particulièrement celle de la modernité, se caractérise précisément p...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l histoire des religionsSame topicWalter Benjamin Studies CompilationFrench-language works237,207