Rencontres des imaginaires littéraires brésilien et canadien : errances et quêtes identitaires chez Jacques Poulin et Milton Hatoum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No imaginário dos países das Américas, existem traços comuns que se manifestam na produção literária. O modo como os europeus conquistaram os territórios, a imigração dos europeus e a relação que esses estabeleceram com os autóctones são alguns dos elementos que explicam certas representações comuns. Entre essas, estão as imagens do “entre-lugar”, “entre-dois”, “duplo”, originárias do choque entre a cultura de origem (européia ou africana) e a de destino, ensejando conflitos, questionamentos e busca de respostas. Inserem-se nessa questão o romance Volkswagen Blues, de Jacques Poulin, e os romances Relato de um certo Oriente e Dois irmãos, de Milton Hatoum. É nessa perspectiva que esses romances são analisados neste trabalho. Résumé: Dans l’imaginaire des pays des Amériques, il existe des traits communs qui se manifestent dans la production littéraire. La façon dont les Européens conquirent les territoires, l’immigration et le rapport avec les autochtones sont quelques-uns des éléments qui expliquent certaines représentations communes. Parmi elles, les images de l’«entre-lieu», de l’«entre-deux» et du «double», originaires du choc entre la culture d’origine (européenne ou africaine) et la culture d’accueil, avec leurs conflits, leurs questionnements et la recherche de réponses. C’est dans cette perspective que sont analysés les romans Volkswagen Blues, de Jacques Poulin, Relato de um certo Oriente (Récit d’un certain Orient) et Dois irmãos (Deux frères), de Milton Hatoum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".