MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1656989426 · doi:10.1109/notere.2015.7293484

Overlay interconnection for end-user applications and wireless sensor networks in MANETs

2015· article· en· W1656989426 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammadmajid Hormati, Fatna Belqasmi, Ferhat Khendek, Roch Glitho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkInterconnectionOverlayDefault gatewayInternetworkingMiddleware (distributed applications)Overlay networkWireless sensor networkArchitectureWirelessDistributed computingGateway (web page)TelecommunicationsThe InternetOperating systemWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambient information collected by wireless sensor networks (WSNs) (e.g. space, environment or physiological data) is made available to end-user applications via gateways. In situations where infrastructure-based networks are not available, these gateways and end-user applications are usually implemented as distributed entities forming P2P overlays. Enabling the interconnection of these application and gateway entities faces crucial challenges due to the nature of infrastructure-less networks such as MANETs and the heterogeneity of protocols, middleware, etc. that are employed by these entities. This paper proposes an architecture that will interconnect overlay gateways for WSNs with end-user applications in MANETs. The architecture relies on interconnector nodes that do not belong to either of the two overlays. A motivating scenario is presented, requirements are derived, and the proposed interconnection architecture is described. The prototype is also briefly discussed along with the performance evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207