Typologie des écrits dela Nouvelle-France : Premiers récits des explorateurs et des missionnaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 y a plusieurs façons de distinguer les divers écrits de la Nouvelle-France : des récits de découverte, des relations religieuses, des histoires de la colonie, de simples récits de voyage et des journaux particuliers.Toutefois, ce sont le plus souvent les destinataires qui déterminent le genre que le rapport va prendre, car les relateurs écrivent pour faire valoir leurs découvertes auprès des autorités, pour solliciter des aumônes ou pour faire venir des colons dans le nouveau pays.Comme ces divers écrits fournissent seuls les renseignements sur la colonie, tous ceux qui s'y intéressent doivent les lire pour s'initier.C'est ainsi qu'ils fournissent une première interprétation de l'histoire.Dans une seconde phase, comme nous le verrons, plusieurs compilateurs s'emploient à les convertir en histoire avec plus ou moins de succès.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".