MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sustained saturating level of glycine induces changes in NR2B‐containing‐NMDA receptor localization in the CA1 region of the hippocampus

2008· article· en· W1658118679 on OpenAlexafffund
Yukio Imamura, Chunlei Ma, Mohan Pabba, Richard Bergeron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNMDA receptorGlycineIfenprodilHippocampal formationHippocampusChemistryGlutamatergicAgonistGlycine receptorNeuroscienceReceptorBiophysicsBiochemistryGlutamate receptorBiologyAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-synaptic actions of glycine are terminated by specialized transporters. There are two genes encoding glycine transporters, GlyT1 and GlyT2. Glycine acts as a co-agonist at N-methyl-d-aspartate glutamatergic receptors (NMDARs). Blockage of GlyT1 enhances NMDAR function by controlling ambient glycine concentrations. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of acute hippocampal slices, we investigated NMDAR kinetics of CA1 pyramidal neurons of mice expressing 50% of GlyT1 (GlyT1+/-). In this study, we report that the glycine modulatory site of the NMDAR at CA1 synapses is saturated in GlyT1+/- but not in wild-type (WT) mice. We also found that the effect of ifenprodil, a highly selective NR2B-containing-NMDAR antagonist, is significantly reduced at CA1 synapses in GlyT1+/- compared to WT mice while immunoblotting experiments do not show significant differences for NR1, NR2A-B-C-D subunits in both types of mice, suggesting alteration in NR2B-containing-NMDAR localization under a state of chronic saturating level of endogenous glycine. Using a pharmacological approach with MK-801 and DL-TBOA, we discriminated synaptic vis-à-vis extra-synaptic NMDARs. We found that NR2B-containing-NMDARs are expressed at a higher level in the extra-synaptic area of CA1 pyramidal neurons from GlyT1+/- compared to WT mice. Our results demonstrate that chronic saturating level of glycine induces significant changes in NMDAR localization and kinetic. Therefore, results from our study should help to gain a better understanding of the role of glycine in pathological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207