Voyages intérieurs dans trois romans contemporains. L’écriture intimiste de Bruno Hébert, Gaétan Soucy et Marie Laberge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la fin du XXe siècle, le roman québécois est caractérisé par une écriture intimiste qui met de l’avant la quête personnelle des protagonistes. Ceux-ci explorent le plus souvent les espaces inconnus à l’intérieur d’eux-mêmes. En fuyant la vie commune pour se retirer dans un monde vaste ou parfois clos, les personnages cherchent à reformuler leur propre identité et leur propre « je ». Dans cet article, je me propose d’analyser l’écriture de trois auteurs contemporains en portant une attention particulière sur la façon dont elle donne forme à ces différents voyages intérieurs. Aussi, en étudiant la représentation des espaces privés et publics, j’analyserai les rapports précaires qui s’établissent entre les personnages et le monde qui les entoure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.030 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".