MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1658471540 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1995.500375

A slot assignment protocol for indoor wireless ATM networks using the channel characteristics and the traffic parameters

2002· article· en· W1658471540 on OpenAlexaff
Naser Movahhedinia, G. Stamatelos, H.M. Hafez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceVariable bitrateChannel (broadcasting)Wireless broadbandBandwidth (computing)Base stationBroadband networksWirelessChannel allocation schemesRadio resource managementBroadbandWireless networkReal-time computingTelecommunicationsQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid development of wireless in-building communication systems, has widened the scope of supported applications. Remote terminals may be capable of producing broadband real-time traffic such as variable bit-rate (VBR) video or highly bursty instantaneous file transfers. So one of the important issues in indoor broadband wireless networks (IBWN) is employment of an efficient bandwidth management protocol. In such a protocol, both the effects of radio channel behavior and the traffic heterogeneity have to be considered. In this paper we present a bandwidth allocation scheme based on the interplay of the radio channel characteristics and the traffic statistical parameters and requirements. In this scheme the base station visits the terminals in a non-uniform cyclic fashion. The intervisit interval and the amount of service which is provided to a user during each visit, is determined based on the channel and traffic parameters. This system is evaluated by simulations and is found to provide improved performance in handling the requirements of multimedia services in IBWN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207