Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most Quaternary geologists working in Atlantic Canada view Robert J. Chalmers’ investigations of the surficial geology of New Brunswick for the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) as seminal contributions. Yet, the fullest biographical information available for Chalmers is a 7-page typescript by E.R. Faribault of the GSC, held at Natural Resources Canada Library in Ottawa. Therefore, it appeared necessary to bring Chalmers’ little-known life, and the variety of his surficial geologic investigations, into the mainstream. Lists of Chalmers’ published works in GSC reports and in periodicals are compiled from all available sources. SOMMAIRE La plupart des geologues du Quaternaire au Canada atlantique voient les etudes de Robert J. Chalmers sur ‘la geologie en surface’ de Nouveau Brunswick pour le Commission geologique du Canada comme des ouevres seminales. Mais, l’information biographique le plus pleine de Chalmers est un texte bref dactylographie par E.R. Faribault du CGC, tenue a la bibliotheque du Departement des Richesses naturelles canadienne a Ottawa. Donc, il apparait necessaire a porter au premier plan sa vie mal-connue, et le variete de ses oeuvres. Aussi, listes des oeuvres de Chalmers pour le CGC et dans les journaux scientifiques sont ici presen-tent des sources disponsible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".