MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1659232243 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1003617

Cutting Edge: Vasostatin-1–Derived Peptide ChgA29–42 Is an Antigenic Epitope of Diabetogenic BDC2.5 T Cells in Nonobese Diabetic Mice

2011· article· en· W1659232243 on OpenAlexafffund
Enayat Nikoopour, Christian Sandrock, Katrina Huszarik, Olga Krougly, Edwin Lee‐Chan, Emma L. Masteller, Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Bhagirath Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEpitopeBiologyT-cell receptorT cellAntigenNodMolecular biologyCell biologyImmune systemImmunologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanistic and therapeutic insights in autoimmune diabetes would benefit from a more complete identification of relevant autoantigens. BDC2.5 TCR transgenic NOD mice express transgenes for TCR Vα1 and Vβ4 chains from the highly diabetogenic BDC2.5 CD4(+) T cell clone, which recognizes pancreatic β cell membrane Ags presented by NOD I-A(g7) MHC class II molecules. The antigenic epitope of BDC2.5 TCR is absent in β cells that do not express chromogranin A (ChgA) protein. However, characterization of the BDC2.5 epitope in ChgA has given inconclusive results. We have now identified a ChgA29-42 peptide within vasostatin-1, an N-terminal natural derivative of ChgA as the BDC2.5 TCR epitope. Having the necessary motif for binding to I-A(g7), it activates BDC2.5 T cells and induces an IFN-γ response. More importantly, adoptive transfer of naive BDC2.5 splenocytes activated with ChgA29-42 peptide transferred diabetes into NOD/SCID mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207