TRADUÇÃO E VALIDAÇÃO DE CONTEÚDO DE UMA BATERIA DE TESTES PARA AVALIAÇÃO DE AMUSIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to perform a cultural adaptation of the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia - MBEA, which constitutes a battery of tests that evaluates musical functions, in order to adapt them to the population of Brazilian adolescents. Research was conducted in three stages: conceptual equivalence, items equivalence and semantic equivalence. The study included 20 non-expert judges and 6 expert judges, responsible for assessing the items of MBEA and their constructs. In the analysis of content, there were high rates of agreement among the judges, except for the constructs of scale and intervals. Considering focus groups, it was observed that adolescents associated the items with classical music, but this did not affect their understanding of the test. Concerning cultural equivalence, 70% of the items had high rates of agreement among judges. Regarding semantic equivalence, there were no significant differences between the back translation and the original version. We conclude to be appropriate to maintain the original items of the test because, in addition to being comprehensible to the target population, they are made within the Western tonal system, which is used in both cultures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".