MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1660399511 · doi:10.21836/pem20090604

Uterine neoplasia in a 14-year old Quarter Horse mare

2009· article· en· W1660399511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W Gimplinger, S. Ennen, A. Remiezowicz, H. Aupperle, L-F Litzke, Axel Wehrend

Bibliographic record

VenuePferdeheilkunde Equine Medicine · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorseQuarter (Canadian coin)GynecologyMedicineVeterinary medicineAnimal scienceBiologyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eine 14-jährige Quarterhorse-Stute wies seit mehr als zwölf Monaten rezidivierenden Vaginalausfluss.Die Stute zeigte seit etwa einem Jahr honigartigen Ausfluss und zeitweise Pollakisurie und Polyurie.Zwei Wochen vor der Vorstellung in der Klinik hatte die Stute blutigen Vaginalausfluss.Die vom Haustierarzt diagnostizierte Umfangsvermehrung im Uterus konnte endoskopisch als 23 x 21 x 18 cm große Umfangsvermehrung im Bereich des Corpus uteri bestätigt werden.Es wurde eine Ovariohysterektomie durchgeführt.Für die pathohistologische Untersuchung des Tumors wurden repräsentative Lokalisationen der Umfangsvermehrung standardmäßig aufgearbeitet und anhand einer H.E.-Färbung untersucht.Immunhistologische Verfahren dienten dem Nachweis der Expression von Desmin und α-Aktin in den Tumorzellen.Zehn Tage nach Ovariohysterektomie wurde die Stute bei gutem Allgemeinbefinden entlassen.Bei der pathologisch-histologischen Untersuchung wurde der Tumor als malignitätsverdächtiges gut bis mäßig differenziertes, infiltrativ wachsendes Leiomyom klassifiziert.Uterustumoren bei der Stute sind selten, können aber -wie in diesem Fall -ausgeprägte klinische Symptome hervorrufen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePferdeheilkunde Equine MedicineSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207