Effect of dew temperature, post-inoculation condition, and pathogen dose on suppression of scentless chamomile by Colletotrichum truncatum 1 First published online 24 January 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Scentless chamomile, a noxious weed in western Canada, has a high natural tolerance to many herbicides. Colletotrichum truncatum, a host specific fungal pathogen, is suppressive to scentless chamomile when applied inundatively. A broadcast application was used at 200 L ha−1 to evaluate biocontrol potential of this pathogen under a range of dew temperatures (DT), post-inoculation conditions (PIC), and pathogen doses (PD). A DT between 20 and 25°C was more conducive to infection, resulting in higher levels of disease and weed suppression as compared to 15 and 30°C. Under similar post-inoculation temperature regimes, disease was only slightly more severe in growth chambers than in the greenhouse. There was a positive linear relationship between the PD and weed suppression. An inoculum concentration >1×108 spores mL−1 reduced plant fresh weight by approximately 50% when compared to untreated controls. These results indicate that biocontrol of scentless chamomile using C. truncatum in the semi-arid Ca...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".