La construcción social del paisaje cultural. Entre el Paseo del Bosque y el Estadio de Estudiantes de La Plata / The Social Construction of the Cultural Landscape. Between Paseo del Bosque and La Plata Students’ Stadium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo presenta los resultados de una investigación sobre las transformaciones y tensiones en el espacio público central cuyo propósito ha sido descubrir, finalmente, los valores en juego en la gestión contemporánea del paisaje cultural urbano. Dicha investigación toma como caso de estudio la ciudad de La Plata (Argentina) y su principal parque urbano, el Paseo del Bosque. Éste contiene en uno de sus bordes al estadio de fútbol del Club Estudiantes de La Plata, uno de los equipos emblemáticos de la ciudad, cuyo proyecto de renovación ha originado un conflicto urbano de una dificultad sin precedentes.AbstractThis article presents the results of the research on the transformations and tensions of the central public space designed to discover the values at stake in contemporary management of the urban cultural landscape. The case study in this research is the city of La Plata (Argentina) and its main urban park, Paseo del Bosque. At the edge of the park stands the stadium of La Plata Students’ football club, one of the most emblematic teams in the city. The project for its renewal has triggered a highly complex urban conflict.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".