MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1661398256 · doi:10.1109/taes.2015.140373

Cognitive chaotic UWB-MIMO radar based on nonparametric Bayesian technique

2015· article· en· W1661398256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOWaveformComputer scienceCognitive radioRadarChaoticLow probability of intercept radarBayesian probabilityAlgorithmCluster analysisArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringPattern recognition (psychology)TelecommunicationsEngineeringRadar engineering detailsBeamformingRadar imagingWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a cognitive waveform selection mechanism for chaotic ultra-wideband multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radars. It utilizes the target discrimination capability of a Dirichlet process mixture model (DPMM)-based clustering approach to discriminate individual extended targets and applies a mutual information (MI)-based mechanism to select the best transmission waveform. This joint DPMM-MI cognitive mechanism aims at enhancing target discrimination and detection, showing a 3-dB performance gain in achieving 0.9 target detection probability over conventional MIMO radar waveforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it