MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1661525189

Sola Experientia: The Bas Van Fraassen Interview

2006· article· nl· W1661525189 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle Jackson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and History of Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpiricismScientific realismPhilosophyPhilosophy of scienceEpistemologyRealism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bas van Fraassen is McCosh Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University. His research interests straddle philosophical logic and philosophy of science, with special interests in empiricism, (anti-)realism, probability, foundations of relativity and quantum physics, religion, and philosophy of literature. His publications include The Scientific Image (Oxford 1980), Laws and Symmetry (Oxford 1989), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Oxford 1991), and The Empirical Stance (Yale 2002). For CV, cat and climbing lore see his website: http://www.princeton.edu/~fraassen/. Interviewed by Kyle Jackson, Chief Editor. Special thanks to Chloe Armstrong for her invaluable assistance in the formulation and editing of the interview questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0070.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhilosophy and History of ScienceFrench-language works237,207