MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W16622905

Core Urban Services, O&M Costs and Their Recovery: A Study of Select Urban Areas in Andhra Pradesh

2011· article· en· W16622905 on OpenAlexaff
Ramakrishna Nallathiga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Development in India
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService delivery frameworkRestructuringBusinessLegislationSustainabilityService (business)Core (optical fiber)Municipal servicesFinancePublic administrationMarketingEngineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) are supposed to provide basic urban services identified under the respective municipal legislation and also to ensure the sustainability of service provision. Financial sustainability of these core services, through the levy of appropriate user charge, is very important and integral to service delivery. Yet, several ULBs do not appear to follow this maxim and continue with ad hoc service delivery and methods of its finance. This paper is an attempt to analyse the performance of select ULBs in Andhra Pradesh in the provision three core urban services, in terms of their OM it then suggests a reform agenda for improving civic service delivery through improved service level/standard, better cost recovery and organisation restructuring

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial and Economic Development in IndiaFrench-language works237,207