MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1662446519 · doi:10.1063/1.1333019

Spectra of jet-cooled SO232 and SO234 in systems ã 3B1 and b 3A2–X 1A1: Rotational structure of perturbed b 3A2

2001· article· en· W1662446519 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng‐Liang Huang, I‐Chia Chen, A. J. Merer, Chi‐Kung Ni, A. H. Kung

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAtomic physicsSpectral lineSupersonic speedSpin (aerodynamics)Molecular physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectra of ã 3B1(ν1ν2ν3)=(110) and (200)–X̃ 1A1(000) of SO232 and SO234 are obtained in a supersonic jet at a resolution 0.015 cm−1. The rotational structures are analyzed for both isotopic species to obtain precise rotational and spin constants. Two new bands at 27 032.222(1) and 27 515.41(1) cm−1 arising from vibronic interaction separately with vibrational state (110) and (200) of ã 3B1 are assigned to transitions to b̃ 3A2(011) and (101). The rotational structure of b̃ 3A2 is observed and analyzed for the first time. The two vibrational states are analyzed to yield effective rotational constants A=1.4348(3), 1.89(3), B=0.3610(3), 0.412(3), and C=0.2689(3), 0.239(3) cm−1, respectively. Then the difference ν1−ν2 of vibrational frequency of b̃ 3A2 is obtained to be 483.19 cm−1. Because of interaction to b̃ 3A2(011) the observed spacing of K stack and spin constants α and β for ã 3B1(110) are smaller whereas the state ã 3B1(200) is relatively unaffected and only spin constants vary significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical Physics→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→