Accurate <i>ab initio</i> potential for the Na+⋯I• complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-level ab initio calculations employing the multireference configuration interaction and coupled clusters methods with a correlation-consistent sequence of basis sets have been used to obtain accurate potential energy curves for the complex of the sodium cation with the iodine atom. Potential curves for the first two electronic Lambda-S states have very different characters: the potential for the 2pi state has a well depth of approximately 10 kcal/mol, while the 2sigma state is essentially unbound. This difference is rationalized in terms of the anisotropic interaction of the quadrupole moment of the iodine atom with the sodium cation, which is stabilizing in the case of the 2pi state and destabilizing in the case of the 2sigma state. The effects of spin-orbit coupling have been accounted for with both ab initio and semiempirical approaches, which have been found to give practically the same results. Inclusion of spin-orbit interactions does not affect the X(omega = 32) ground state, which retains its 2pi character, but it results in two omega = 12 spin-orbit states, with mixed 2sigma and 2pi characters and binding energies roughly half of that of the ground spin-orbit state. Complete basis set (CBS) extrapolations of potential curves, binding energies, and equilibrium geometries were also performed, and used to calculate a number of rovibronic parameters for the Na+...I* complex and to parameterize model potentials. The final CBS-extrapolated and zero-point vibrational energy-corrected binding energy is 10.2 kcal/mol. Applications of the present results for simulations of NaI photodissociation femtosecond spectroscopy are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".