Beijing Service Sector and its Demand Structure: Changes and Impact A Comparative Analysis Based on Regional Input-Output Table SECTEUR DES SERVICES DE BEIJING ET SA STRUCTURE DE DEMANDE: CHANGEMENTS ET IMPACTS UNE ANALYSE COMPARATIVE FONDÉE SUR LE TABLEAU D'IMPORT-EXPORT RÉGIONAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mode of economic growth and industrial structure of Beijing city is an exceptional case in China. By utilizing the regional input-output table, the comparison research reveals that the remarkable transformation of demand structure in service sector contributes greatly to its rapid development in Beijing. The statistics show that the outflow rate of service sectors has increased by 17% in the final demand. It proves that Beijing's radiating capacity to the rest of China has much strengthened and that the service sector gives tremendous impetus to other industries. In comparison with that of Washington State of the United States, the demand structure of Beijing's service sector changes in regular proportion to the usual rule and shows a similar tendency to that of developed countries. Key words: service sector; demand structure; input-output table; output requirement coefficientResume: Le mode de croissance economique et la structure industrielle de la ville de Beijing est un cas exceptionnel en Chine. En utilisant le tableau d'import-export regional, la recherche de comparaison revele que la transformation remarquable de la structure dedemande dans le secteur des services contribue grandement a son developpement rapide a Beijing. Les statistiques montrent que le taux d'exportation du secteur des services a augmente de 17% dans la demande finale. Cela prouve que la capacite radiatrice de Pekin au reste de la Chine a ete renforce et que le secteur des services donne une impulsion considerable a d'autres industries. En comparaison avec celle de Washington aux Etats-Unis, la structure de demande du secteur des services de Pekin change en proportion reguliere a la regle habituelle et montre une tendance similaire a celle des pays developpes. Mots-cles: secteur des services; structure de demande; tableau d'import-export; indicateurs productifs
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".