On the spin wave approximation in the theory of magnetically ordered crystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The question of the self-consistency of spin wave theory as applied to different spin arrangements in magnetically ordered crystals has been reinvestigated. A set of equations, involving the probabilities of finding a given number of spin deviations at a given site first proposed by Van Kranendonk and Van Vleck (1958) in connection with a simple cubic antiferromagnet at a temperature of 0°K, is generalised and solved exactly for an arbitrary temperature. Two sets of equations are solved both for the case of a simple cubic antiferromagnet and for more general spin arrangements, collectively referred to as spiral spin arrangements. In solving for the probabilities a method is developed for easy calculation of the thermal average of certain functions of number operators. Finally, numerical results are given for some probabilities connected with: (i) the simple cubic antiferromagnet and (ii) a model of the rare earth metal, dysprosium. The latter is of some interest in view of the investigations of spiral spin arrangements in recent years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".