MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1663404135 · doi:10.1109/iccct2.2015.7292775

Dynamic and integrated approach for proxy-Mobile-IPv6 (PMIPv6) based IP Flow Mobility and offloading

2015· article· en· W1663404135 on OpenAlexaff
Madhavan Kalyanaraman, Swaminathan Seetharaman, S. Srikanth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProxy Mobile IPv6Computer scienceComputer networkDistributed computingMobility modelCellular networkCellular trafficWireless networkStandardizationWirelessMobile computingMobile IPTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data traffic in Mobile networks is increasing exponentially since last few years and is projected to increase multifold before the end of this decade. Evolution in heterogeneous wireless networks and network based mobility protocols has enabled the usage of simultaneous traffic flows on all available wireless accesses. Standardization of IP Flow Mobility (IFOM) from 3GPP Release 10 provides possibility to seamlessly transfer individual flows from one access to another. Optimization of cellular resources, using a low-cost interface, traffic load balancing etc. are some of the factors due to which flow transfer can happen. However, an integrated mechanism to identify whether a traffic flow has to be moved to a different interface considering user preferences, network conditions, mobility, policy aspects, network protocols supported and terminal capabilities is not available. This paper proposes an dynamic and integrated mechanism that assesses the interface used for each traffic flow and determines the need for flow transfer to offer the best Quality of Experience for the user while using cellular network resources in an optimal manner. We propose the architecture showing the various components and their interactions to realize our proposed mechanism of flow transfer/offload based on the above-mentioned criteria. A simulation framework that is being used to validate our approach and demonstrate its benefits/improvements under various practical scenarios is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207