MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Shortening Speed Dependence of Concentric Force Potentiation in the Absence of Myosin Phosphorylation

2015· article· en· W1664019492 on OpenAlexafffund
Jordan Bunda, Bill Gittings, Rene Vandenboom

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLong-term potentiationChemistryPhosphorylationMyosinMyosin light-chain kinaseContraction (grammar)ConcentricStimulationBiophysicsMuscle contractionSkeletal muscleInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryBiologyGeometryReceptorMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contraction‐induced elevation of myoplasmic Ca 2+ leads to sequential activation of skeletal muscle myosin light chain kinase (skMLCK), an enzyme responsible for phosphorylating the myosin regulatory light chain (RLC). In wildtype (WT) mouse skeletal muscle containing skMLCK, force potentiation correlates with RLC phosphate content; although, these muscles may contain an RLC phosphorylation‐independent component. In this study, extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles from knockout (KO) C57BL/6 mice, devoid of skMLCK, were activated in vitro (25°C) across a range of stimulation frequencies (10, 25, 45, 70 and 100 Hz) and subjected to shortening ramps at 0.1, 0.3 or 0.5 of maximal shortening velocity (V max ). This was performed before and after a standard conditioning stimulus (CS) that potentiated mean concentric force at 0.3 and 0.5 V max to 1.20 ± 0.03 and 1.30 ± 0.02 of unpotentiated ( pre‐CS ) values, respectively; however, mean forces were depressed to 0.84 ± 0.03 of pre‐CS values at 0.1 V max ( n = 3, P < 0.05). Increasing shortening speed augmented the frequency at which concentric force potentiation was maximal: 25 and 45 Hz at 0.3 and 0.5 V max , respectively. These results mirrored previous results from WT muscles (Gittings et al., 2012), except that concentric force potentiation was attenuated by ~50% across all frequencies at 0.3 and 0.5 V max , while force at 0.1 V max was reduced rather than unchanged. Thus, our data indicates the presence of an RLC phosphorylation‐independent mechanism for potentiation in skMLCK KO muscles that may complement the intact RLC phosphorylation mechanism in WT muscles. Supported by NSERC (2014‐05122).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies→French-language works237,207→