MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1664353658

RECONSTRUYENDO LA NACIÓN: NARRATIVAS ALTERADAS EN LA OBRA TEATRAL NICARAGÜENSE 'EL GÜEGÜENSE'

2014· article· es· W1664353658 on OpenAlexaff
Alberto Guevara

Bibliographic record

VenueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Central America
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La obra de teatro más antigua que se conoce en Nicaragua, El Güegüense, es una de las referencias culturales más reconocibles y representativas de este país. A través de su narrativa social y cultural, que se ubica tanto dentro como fuera de la representación teatral/dramática, la obra se ha convertido en un importante punto de encuentro para las negociaciones sobre la identidad nicaragüense. Algunos nicaragüenses ven la representación de la obra como un medio para evocar y comunicar sus memorias, sus conocimientos, su individualidad y su religiosidad a través de las funciones públicas. Este artículo analiza las prácticas locales contemporáneas de la obra, que toman forma en su representación anual llevada a cabo en la ciudad de Diriamba, y las compara con las interpretaciones de la élite intelectual y literaria nicaragüense realizadas sobre el texto teatral de El Güegüense. Hay que señalar que las experiencias encarnadas por los actores que interpretan la obra producen una ruptura con la narrativa nacionalista y homogeneizada de la identidad “Mestiza” nicaragüense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.129

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona)Same topicHistorical Studies in Central AmericaFrench-language works237,207