MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1664409473 · doi:10.3233/isp-2010-0058

Performance study of podded propulsor in static azimuthing conditions

2009· article· en· W1664409473 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Shipbuilding Progress · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCommunity Sector Council Newfoundland and LabradorMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsorMarine engineeringEngineeringAeronauticsPropeller

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comprehensive experimental study on variations of propulsive characteristics of puller and pusher podded propulsors in static azimuthing open water conditions. A custom designed experimental apparatus consisting of a six-component global dynamometer and a three-component pod dynamometer was used to measure the propulsive performance of a model pod unit in pusher and puller configurations in a towing tank. The pod model was tested to measure the forces on the whole unit as well as thrust and torque of the propeller shaft for a range of advance coefficients combined with a range of static azimuth angles from +30° to −30°. The variations in forces and moments of the propulsor unit with change of azimuth angle and advance speed are presented in non-dimensional forms. The results illustrate that the propeller thrust and torque as well as the unit axial, side forces and the steering moment are complex functions of the azimuth angle and propeller loading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it