MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1664525523 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2015.7280700

A modular mixed-signal CVNS neural network architecture

2015· article· en· W1664525523 on OpenAlexaff
Farinoush Saffar, Mitra Mirhassani, Majid Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModular designArtificial neural networkNetwork architectureSynaptic weightFlexibility (engineering)ChipElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper design and implementation of a modular mixed-signal feed-forward neural network is presented. The network is implemented based on the Continuous Valued Number System (CVNS) arithmetic with neurons distributed in the network. Synapse weights are implemented on the chip using capacitive analog memories. Weight values are stored as the CVNS values and are refreshed and updated using the overlap between the CVNS digits. Current-mode logic is used for implementation in order to simplify the circuit design, and especially addition, which resulted in reduced power and area consumption. The distributed nature of the neurons allows for expansion of the network into larger networks. Individual modular layers are fabricated in TSMC CMOS 180nm, and are used to form different network sizes. The module is used to configure two proof of concept examples, a 2 - 2 - 1 and a 3 - 2 - 1 network to solve the XOR problem. Results of test and verification presented in this paper show the network flexibility of the proposed design to form various network configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207