MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1665030202 · doi:10.1177/0954410015586843

Linearized J2 and atmospheric drag model for satellite relative motion with small eccentricity

2015· article· en· W1665030202 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEccentricity (behavior)Nonlinear systemDragMotion (physics)SatelliteEquations of motionOrbit (dynamics)PhysicsMathematical analysisMathematicsClassical mechanicsMechanicsAerospace engineeringEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new set of linearized differential equations governing relative motion between satellites in a formation is derived, taking into account the effects of [Formula: see text] as well as atmospheric drag. This set of equations is more convenient than the corresponding nonlinear equations for designing formation control system or for implementing guidance algorithms. It is assumed that the eccentricity of the chief's orbit is small. In addition, the corresponding constant linearized equations are also proposed without numerical integrated, which is more convenient for engineering applications. Simulations show that the results obtained from the linearized model are quite close to those obtained by integrating the nonlinear dynamics model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it