MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1665097524

Remote Sensing of Pan-Arctic Snowpack Thaw Using the SeaWinds Scatterometer

2003· article· en· W1665097524 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. A. Rawlins, Kyle C. McDonald, Steve Frolking, Richard B. Lammers, M. A. Fahnestock, John S. Kimball, Charles J Vörösmarty

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatterometerSnowpackRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceArcticSnowThe arcticMeteorologyClimatologyGeographyGeologyOceanographyWind speed
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remotely sensed estimates of snowpack thaw state offer the potential of more complete spatial coverage across remote, undersampled areas such as the terrestrial Arctic drainage basin. We compared the timing of spring thaw determined from approximately 25 km resolution daily radar backscatter data with observed daily river discharge time series and model simulated snowpack water content data for 52 basins (5000--10,000 km2) across Canada and Alaska for the spring of 2000. Algorithms for identifying critical thaw transitions were applied to daily backscatter time series from the SeaWinds scatterometer aboard NASA QuikSCAT, the obs erved discharge data, and model snowpack water from the pan-Arctic Water Balance Model (PWBM). Radar-derived thaw shows general agreement with discharge increases (mean absolute difference, MAD = 21 days, r = 0.45), with better agreement (16 days) in basins with moderate--high runoff due to snowmelt. Even better agreement is noted when comparing the scatterometer-derived primary thaw timing with model simulated snow water increase (MAD = 14 days, r = 0.75). Good correspondence is found across higher latitude basins in western Canada and Alaska, while the largest discrepancies appear at the driest watersheds with lower snow and daily discharge amounts. Extending this analysis to the entire pan-Arctic drainage basin, we compared scatterometer-derived date of the primary (maximum) thaw with the timing of simulated snow water increases from the PWBM. Good agreement is found across much of the pan-Arctic; almost half (49.4%) of the analyzed grid cells have an associated MAD of ≤ 7 days. MADs are 11.7 days for the Arctic basin in Eurasian and 15.1 days across North America. Mean biases are low; 2.1 and -3.1 days for Eurasia and North America respectively. Stronger backscatter response (high signal--low noise) is noted with higher snow cover, low to moderate tree cover and low topographic complexity. The greatest differences between the remotely sensed thaw timing and model snowmelt initiation are primarily due to the identification of two (or more) major thaw events during spring. This analysis suggests that active radar instruments such as the SeaWinds scatterometer offer the potential for monitoring high-latitude snowpack thaw at spati al scales appropriate for pan-Arctic applications in near real time. Potential applications include hydrological model verification, analysis of lags between snowmelt and river response, and determination of large-scale snow extent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)Same topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207