MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Les premières enseignantes laïques au Québec. Le cas de Montréal, 1825-1835

2006· article· fr· W1665251491 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrée Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire de l éducation · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article montre la contribution des enseignantes laïques à la formation de la jeunesse vivant en milieu urbain au Québec dans le premier tiers du XIXe siècle. Montréal, ville mi-francophone, mi-anglophone à l’époque, a été choisie comme terrain d’enquête. Comme ailleurs en Occident, ces femmes se sont approprié avec succès la tâche d’instruire les enfants et les jeunes filles. L’enseignement devient pour plusieurs d’entre elles une carrière valorisante, un métier rentable qu’elles pratiquent auprès d’une clientèle diversifiée dans un cadre d’autonomie ou de relative autonomie. On ne peut leur attribuer une volonté de professionnalisation. Il reste que leurs efforts auront permis la scolarisation d’un nombre considérable de jeunes enfants et aux filles de poursuivre leur scolarité au-delà du primaire, et cela, avant que l’État ne prenne, en milieu urbain comme en milieu rural, l’initiative de l’instruction publique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire de l éducationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207