MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1666126024 · doi:10.1142/9789812777218_0053

COMPTON SCATTERING ON THE PROTON AND LIGHT NUCLEI IN THE Δ-RESONANCE REGION

2002· article· en· W1666126024 on OpenAlexaff
O. Schölten, S. Kondratyuk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCompton scatteringProtonResonance (particle physics)Nuclear physicsScatteringAtomic physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microscopic calculations of Compton scattering on the free proton and light nuclei are presented. For the description of Compton scattering on the proton the conventional K-matrix approach and the ``Dressed K-Matrix'' model are introduced. The latter approach can be used to calculate polarizabilities as well as Compton scattering for photon energies upto 1 GeV since it obeys the symmetry properties which are appropriate in the different energy regions. In particular, crossing symmetry, gauge invariance and unitarity are satisfied. The extent of violation of analyticity (causality) is used as an expansion parameter. Coherent Compton scattering on light nuclei at 200--300 MeV is studied in the impulse approximation and is shown to be a sensitive probe of the in-medium properties of the Δ -resonance. Modifications of the properties of the Δ-resonance due to the nuclear medium are accounted for through the self-energy operator of the Δ. The dominant medium effects such as the Pauli blocking effects in the decay width, effective nucleon mass and particle--hole excitations in the pion propagator are consistently included in nuclear matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207