MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1666428525

BOLIDE FRAGMENTATION PROCESSES : SINGLE-BODY MODELING VERSUS THE CATASTROPHIC FRAGMENTATION LIMIT.

2001· paratext· en· W1666428525 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · 2001
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsDouglas College
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsFragmentation (computing)Statistical physicsMeteoroidPhysicsComputer scienceAstrobiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The catastrophic 'pancake' fragmentation process, proposed as being generally applicable to very large meteoroid entry in the early 1990's by a number of workers, has been carefully examined. In this effort, the transition from the traditional single-body dynamics and energetics model to a catastrophic 'pancake' fragmentation process has been delineated. The key parameters are the {mu} parameter originally proposed by Levin and the fragmentation scale height, Hf, which we have derived from {mu}. It has been found that this break-up process can only occur for an optimum set of circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it