MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1666493241 · doi:10.1063/1.2732681

Optical phonons via oblique-incidence infrared spectroscopy and their deformation potentials in In1−xGaxAs

2007· article· en· W1666493241 on OpenAlexaff
D. J. Lockwood, Guolin Yu, N. L. Rowell, Philip J. Poole

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhononCondensed matter physicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials sciencePlane of incidenceInfraredOpticsChemistryPhysicsPlane wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concentration dependence of optical phonons in In1−xGaxAs epilayers grown by chemical beam epitaxy and lattice matched to InP(100), where the epilayer strain is zero for x=0.46809, has been characterized for 0.25<x<0.8 with polarized far infrared reflectivity measurements at an oblique angle of incidence. In this method, the reflectance spectra contain sharp Berreman peaks exactly at the optic phonon frequencies. For radiation polarized in the plane of incidence (p polarized), Berreman peaks for both transverse optic (TO) and longitudinal optic (LO) modes are observed, whereas for s polarization only TO modes are seen. The derivatives of the measured spectra were fitted to Lorentzian line shapes to evaluate the various phonon modes, which included GaAs-like TO and LO phonons, disorder induced TO and LO modes, and InAs-like TO and LO phonons. The concentration dependences of the phonon frequencies were used to estimate the phonon deformation potentials of the bulk alloy. Indirect evidence is obtained for LO mode repulsion at low x values from the concentration dependences of the GaAs-like modes in both strained and bulk In1−xGaxAs and from an unphysical variation with x of the GaAs-like LO phonon deformation potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207