Г. А. Иннис vs С. М. Липсет: о национальном выборе канадского будущего в исторической ретроспективе
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the main approaches of the Canadian political economist H.A. Innis and the American sociologist S.M. Lipset to the origins and the evolution of the Canadian political culture. Based on the study of these researchers' scholarly legacy, the author reveals significant differences in the way they determine the origins of the Canadian political culture. According to Harold Innis, the cultural and political traditions in Canada were based on a monocultural economy focused on the production of staples, while Seymour Lipset believed that the determining factor in the Canadian choice of ideology, identity, political system and political culture were the results of the American Revolution. The author traces the relationship and differences between the theories of these North American scholars, finds a number of contradictions, makes some comments, voices his criticism and gives his own point of view on the origins of Canada's political culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".