MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1669079516

A numerical study on the effect of vibrator shape on the development of nonlinear standing waves in a 2-D acoustical resonator

2007· article· en· W1669079516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiston (optics)ResonatorAcousticsVibrator (electronic)Nonlinear systemDiaphragm (acoustics)AmplitudeMechanicsAcoustic wave equationPhysicsWaveformSound pressureStanding waveVibrationAcoustic waveOpticsVoltage
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The numerical analysis of the effects of different shape of the vibrator on the pressure and velocity profile in 2-D nonlinear standing wave resonator is studied. The wave equation for high-amplitude nonlinear acoustic waves in a thermo-viscous fluid is derived from the basic equations of fluid mechanics along with an appropriate state equation. Three different shapes are considered for the diaphragm which are, constant shape vibrating piston, circular shape and cosine shape, to investigate the effects of the diaphragm shape on the pressure and velocity waveforms of an acoustic resonator. It is observed that for the same maximum vibrational velocity of the diaphragm, the amplitudes of the pressure and velocity for constant shape vibrating piston are largest and for cosine shape are smallest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it