MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W166917524

Церковь, государство и реформы права в Византии VI века

2013· article· ru· W166917524 on OpenAlex
Бровченко Игнатий Юрьевич

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueПробелы в российском законодательстве. Юридический журнал · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsByzantine architectureEmpireState (computer science)Theme (computing)PragmatismPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)Interpretation (philosophy)Flexibility (engineering)Political scienceHistorySociologyEpistemologyClassicsPhilosophyLawComputer scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article is devoted to the main historical events in Byzantium of VIth century. The aim of the study was writing task based on the analysis of Justinian show legitimate authorities are trying to achieve unity of Church and State. It allowed more convincingly put the question on the impact of historical, political, economic, social, and religious factors on the development of a particular society. The study is based on a wide range of sources and literature (M.Maas, J.Barker, E.Jeffreys, G.Pfannmuller, G. Ostrogorsky, A. Knecht). History of Byzantium VI and its impact on the world can be described in the following interacting models: ordering disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. Modern level of research on this topic suggests that the development of the theme needs synthesized methodological approach. For example, Canadian theologian theological method B.Lonergan is well founded (B.Lonergan. Method in Theology; P.Feyerabend. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge). The theme is interesting in that the broader modern interpretation of sources on the history of Byzantium VI can serve as a basis for the new conclusions. As the main features of the current era should be highlighted: compliance policy Justinian board long-term public interest, flexibility and pragmatism, the ability to use the prevailing circumstances, the importance for the state government's own understanding of church and state problems. Process of historical, philosophical, theological understanding of Byzantine history and deep understanding of heritage board empire is not yet complete. Knowledge of the Byzantine Empire and its impact on Russian history form the link between the past and the modern understanding a common identity based on motives and ideals in society. The author of the study attempted to engage in a new research field in the direction of an integrated knowledge of the past and how its representation. It was important to understand the social aspect of what was the church-political ideal of Justinian, the comparison of the opposing parties, their internal social differences, needs to reform, strengthening the spiritual core of the relationship between Church and state. Value of the study is to confirm the withdrawal of requiring understanding and clarify issues related to one of the most important stages in the formation of the Byzantine Empire, as well as the use of different methodological approaches to the study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it