MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W166989379

Experimental study and theoretical modelling of ultrasonic wave propagation in resistance spot welds.

2003· article· en· W166989379 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andriy M. Chertov

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpot weldingUltrasonic sensorAcousticsWeldingMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theoretical and experimental study of resistance spot weld quality has a long history. Since the invention of the method manufacturers are concerned about the means of quality assurance of the joints. One of the most promising current techniques of quality inspection is the real time ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation. In such a system the acoustic signals are sent through the spot weld during welding and then analyzed to predict the size of the future joint. In spite of its purely industrial application and seemingly easy setup the problem involves several complicated mechanisms to be described using a physical-mathematical approach. This thesis is concerned with the development of mathematical models describing thermal dynamics in the system and acoustic wave propagation through it. The analysis of these results helps to understand the ways the system could affect the transmitted signal. The models are compared with experimental observations. Possible applications of the developed simulations are discussed.Dept. of Physics. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2003 .C49. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 43-01, page: 0224. Adviser: Roman Gr. Maev. Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicAdvanced Welding Techniques AnalysisFrench-language works237,207