MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1669968883 · doi:10.1002/9781118590331.ch7

Pervaporative extraction of dairy aroma compounds

2015· other· en· W1669968883 on OpenAlexaff
Boya Zhang, Panida Sampranpiboon, Xianshe Feng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane Separation and Gas Transport
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPervaporationAromaChemistryExtraction (chemistry)DistillationFlavorChromatographyMembraneFood sciencePermeation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few decades, a considerably large number of flavored compounds in dairy products have been identified. Recently, the recovery of these flavor compounds from dairy products has attracted significant attention. During processing of dairy products, some volatile aroma compounds may be lost due to evaporation or thermal degradation. Traditionally, aroma compounds are concentrated and recovered by solvent extraction, distillation, partial condensation, and gas stripping. Pervaporation, as a relatively new separation process, has attracted attention as an alternative to the conventional flavor recovery technologies. Pervaporation is based on selective solubility and diffusivity of the permeant in the membrane. This chapter reviews the basic principles of pervaporative extraction and enrichment of aroma compounds, and the current status of pervaporation membranes for concentration of dairy aromas. It also discusses the characteristics of pervaporation separation and some potential technical issues related to pervaporative extraction of dairy aromas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMembrane Separation and Gas TransportFrench-language works237,207