MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1670074946

Amagmatic Extension and Thick Oceanic Crust in the Eastern Black Sea.

2004· article· en· W1670074946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. L. Scott, D. J. Shillington, P. Jeffrey Brown, T. A. Minshull, R. A. Edwards, Nicky White

Bibliographic record

VenueAGU Fall Meeting Abstracts · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCrustRiftMagmatismOceanic crustContinental crustContinental marginPaleontologyLithosphereMantle (geology)Sedimentary basinSeismologyTectonicsSubduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volcanic rifted margins exhibit extensive syn-rift magmatism during extension and produce thick ocean crust during initial spreading, whilst magma-poor margins are characterised by limited syn-rift magmatism, highly stretched continental crust and areas of exhumed mantle. Often these two types of rifting can be seen along the same margin (e.g., Gulf of California and eastern Canada), but the nature of the transition from one to the other is poorly understood. New seismic refraction data collected in the Eastern Black Sea (EBS) provide provocative new constraints on this type of transition. The Black Sea can be divided into two sub-basins that have distinct tectonic histories. The EBS is thought to have opened by rotation of the Shatsky Ridge away from the Mid Black Sea High, with rifting culminating in the early Cenozoic. Previous studies have revealed a thick sedimentary package (8-9 km) underlain by thin crust in the centre of the basin, but the nature of the crust has remained controversial. In spring 2005, we collected four wide-angle seismic profiles in the EBS basin as shown in figure 1. Lines 2 and 3 are approximately orientated parallel to the inferred direction of extension and located ~ 200 km apart. Line 1 connects these lines, traversing the centre of the basin and sampling some of the thinnest crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGU Fall Meeting AbstractsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207