MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1670645354

Ba Isotope Composition of Tagish Lake Meteorite

2011· article· en· W1670645354 on OpenAlexaff
G. Srinivasan, Arshad Ali, Iffat Jabeen, S. Srinivasan

Bibliographic record

VenueLunar and Planetary Science Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeteoriteMurchison meteoriteIsotopeChondriteGeologyAllende meteoriteMineralogyStable isotope ratioGeochemistryAstrobiologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The study of Ba isotopes is useful tool to understand the variations in s-process and r-process produced isotopes in the whole rock fractions of primitive meteorites [1]. Isotopic anomalies in Ba, Sm and Nd have been established in whole rock samples through high precision measurements using TIMS [1-3]. These measurements have shown that while there are p process deficiencies in Sm, and there is no r or s process anomaly in Nd or Sm. Ba isotope anomalies in Murchison acid residues have been known since early 1990s. Furthermore it has also been shown that acid leaches of whole rock fractions of meteorites show variable anomalies in Ba, suggesting different carrier phases for the different anomalies [4]. We report here preliminary results from similar leaching experiments of Tagish Lake meteorite and Ba isotope composition in the leach fractions and residue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLunar and Planetary Science ConferenceSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207