MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W16706857 · doi:10.1063/1.3430571

Infrared spectra of OCS–C6H6, OCS–C6H6–He, and OCS–C6H6–Ne van der Waals complexes

2010· article· en· W16706857 on OpenAlexaff
M. Dehghany, J. Norooz Oliaee, Mahin Afshari, N. Moazzen‐Ahmadi, A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forcePolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared spectrum of weakly bound OCS–C6H6 is studied in the region of the ν1 fundamental band of OCS (∼2050 cm−1) using a tunable diode laser spectrometer to probe a pulsed supersonic jet expansion. This is one of the first direct infrared observations of a benzene-containing van der Waals complex. A very simple band is observed, corresponding to the parallel transition of a symmetric top. It is shifted by −11.1 cm−1 with respect to the free OCS monomer. The isotopologues OCS–C13 C125H6 and OC S34–C6H6 are observed, and the derived structure has OCS located along the benzene C6 symmetry axis in an S-bonded configuration with a center of mass separation of 4.42 Å, in good agreement with previous microwave spectra. Similar bands are observed for the trimers OCS–C6H6–He and OCS–C6H6–Ne, whose structure is obtained by adding an on-axis rare gas atom to the other side of the benzene. However, the analogous band for OCS–C6H6–Ar is not detected, raising the possibility that the stable form of this trimer may not have the same symmetrical structure. A “mystery” feature is observed close to the OCS–C6H6 band origin and its possible assignment to a cluster such as OCS–(C6H6)3 is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207