Magnetic telemanipulation device with mass uncertainty: Modeling, simulation and testing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, magnetic telemanipulation devices have shown a great deal of promise in such areas as semi-conductor manufacturing, wind tunnels, drug delivery, and many more. However, these devices are generally associated with problems caused by payload variation and uncertainties in the parameters of the system which in turn, have limited the development and application of magnetic telemanipulation technology to its full capacity. This paper addresses and deals with these issues by implementation of a precise position control method for a magnetic telemanipulation system with high level of uncertainties in its parameters. The levitation system used in this study is primarily designed for performing remote pick and place operations. The levitated object is a 28 gr microrobot capable of grasping and releasing payloads as heavy as 8 gr. To cope with the uncertainties in the modeling and payload variation, a model reference adaptive feedback linearization (MRAFL) controller is designed and its performance compared with an ordinary feedback linearization (FL) controller. Through experimental results it is shown that the MRAFL controller enables the microrobot to grasp and transport a payload as heavy as 30% of its own weight without a considerable effect on its positioning accuracy. In the presence of the payload, the MRAFL controller resulted in a RMS positioning error of 8 μm} compared with 27.9 μm} of the FL controller. The approach presented in this work is versatile as it leads to the modeling and control of a highly nonlinear system through a modular approach that can be applied to a variety of magnetic levitation and telemanipulation systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".