MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1671157242

Frequency analysis of the acoustic pressure of nonlinear standing waves

2007· article· en· W1671157242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsStanding waveParticle velocitySound pressureNonlinear systemFrequency domainAmplitudeSIGNAL (programming language)Acoustic wave equationPhysicsAcoustic waveTime domainResonatorNonlinear acousticsOpticsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The acoustic pressure inside a nonlinear standing wave resonator in the frequency domain. and the effect of nonlinearity on the frequency spectrum of the pressure signal through numerical and experimental investigations are examined. Analytical. numerical and experimental analysis of linear and nonlinear standing acoustic waves in time and space domains have been extensively investigated. We have developed a setup to measure high-amplitude pressure inside the standing wave tube, and the setup consists of a rigid-walled tube of adjustable length, a driving system to excite the standing wave inside the tube, and data acquisition system. The measurements were made at five different locations along the channel center axis, at different excitation voltages. The frequency spectrum of the pressure and particle velocity' signals were analyzed at different frequencies by using verified model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it