A.3. Hippodamos de Milet: évolution ou révolution des structures spatiales urbaines?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limitation déterminée du nombre des citoyens, division tripartite du corps civique de la polis en classes sociales, division fonctionnelle du territoire de la ville en trois lots, division tripartite des lois en espèces juridiques liées aux trois genres de délits: telles sont les célèbres innovations opérées par Hippodamos à Milet et au Pirée au cours du Vème siècle grec. Le zoning fonctionnel hippodamien nous propose une autre grammaire spatiale qui rend compte à la fois de la rationalité et de la géométrie des structures civiques et des programmes idéologiques dont elles constituent l’expression. L’urbanisme ionien classique ainsi esquissé, constitue-t-il une révolution des manières d’agencement du territoire de la cité grecque ou un rayonnement des paradigmes architecturaux expérimentés dans le milieu colonial de la Sicile du VIIe s. av. J.-C. ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".