<scp>SPECT</scp>‐based functional lung imaging for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis: A clinical and dosimetric correlation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: When we irradiate lung cancer, the radiation dose that can be delivered safely is limited by the risk of radiation pneumonitis (RP) in the surrounding normal lung. This risk is dose-dependent and is commonly predicted using metrics such as the V20, which are usually formulated assuming homogeneous pulmonary function. Because in vivo pulmonary function is not homogeneous, if highly functioning lung can be identified beforehand and preferentially avoided during treatment, it might be possible to reduce the risk of RP, suggesting the utility of function-based prediction metrics. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 26 patients who received ventilation and perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) immediately prior to curative-intent radiation therapy. Patients were separated into non-RP and RP groups. As-treated dose-volume histogram (DVH), perfusion-SPECT-based and ventilation-SPECT-based dose-function histogram (DFH) parameters were defined for each group and were tested for differences. The relative utilities of ventilation-based and perfusion-based DFH metrics were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The standard mean lung dose (MLD) was significantly higher in the RP group; the standard V20 and V30 were higher in the RP group but not significantly. Perfusion-weighted and ventilation-weighted values of the MLD, V20 and V30 were all significantly higher in the RP group. ROC analysis suggested that SPECT-based DFH parameters outperformed standard DVH parameters as predictors of RP. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT-based DFH parameters appear to be useful as predictors of RP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it