MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1672066343 · doi:10.1080/15567265.2015.1045640

Advances in Studying Phonon Mean Free Path Dependent Contributions to Thermal Conductivity

2015· article· en· W1672066343 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Keith T. Regner, Justin P. Freedman, Jonathan A. Malen

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsThermal conductivityMean free pathMaterials sciencePhononThermal conductionThermalThermal conductivity measurementCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsOpticsComposite materialPhysicsScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal conductivity of a material or device is dependent on its characteristic dimension. When the characteristic dimension is commensurate to the mean free paths of thermal energy carriers, the thermal conductivity decreases. The precise relationship between characteristic size and thermal conductivity, which depends on the distribution of energy carrier mean free paths in the material, is not straightforward to determine experimentally. The utility of this relationship has led many researchers to study the mean free path dependent contributions of thermal energy carriers to the thermal conductivity of materials, known as the thermal conductivity accumulation function. This review highlights a number of recent experimental results and techniques used to study the thermal conductivity accumulation function, including transient thermal grating, time domain thermoreflectance, and broadband frequency domain thermoreflectance. In these techniques, nondiffusive thermal transport is induced (i.e., thermal gradients occur over length scales comparable to energy carrier mean free paths) and an effective thermal conductivity of the material is determined. We conclude with our outlook on future directions for the field focused on improved interpretations of the experiments and new materials with unique mean free path distributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscale and Microscale Thermophysical EngineeringSame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207