MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W167213734 · doi:10.1177/153660060903000203

Nationalism in United States Music Education during World War II

2009· article· en· W167213734 on OpenAlexaff
J. Scott Goble

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Historical Research in Music Education · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Music Education Insights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusic educationSolidarityNationalismInternationalism (politics)AestheticsMusicalMusic historyGermanSociologyPedagogyPsychologyPolitical scienceLawHistoryLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the early decades of the twentieth century, educators in the United States were not concerned with promoting musical nationalism through their teaching, in contrast with many of their European contemporaries. Rather, they wished cultivate the taste and expand the international perspectives of their students. They sought immerse them in the musical works of European master composers on the basis of their belief that exposure and involvement in music, a morally elevated art, would have liberating and elevating effects. Influential educator James Mursell (and others) wrote rhapsodically and at length about the value of in education, asserting that music, in its essence, expresses and embodies emotion, and that students could find personal happiness through the self-fulfillment that stems from musical involvement. (1) Simultaneously, many educators sought broaden their students' international perspectives by introducing them the music of many lands and peoples, and the profession's leaders held that an important aim of their work was enable children to know, love, and appreciate in as many forms as possible. (2) However, after the German invasion of Poland in September 1939, which began World War II in Europe, the focus on as an art and orientations toward musical internationalism began lose their centrality in public school education in the United States. Music educators' fears caused them regard their teaching in a very different way. Realizing that they could play an important role in the growing crisis, they largely set aside their artistic goals, refocusing their instruction and selecting for the purposes of contributing the nation's solidarity and bolstering the morale of the nation's populace. This change in their orientation did not stem from a highly debated philosophical or theoretical shift within the profession, but rather emerged gradually as citizens became increasingly distraught over the war in Europe and fearful that they might be engaged in it. (3) Responding the War in Europe Throughout the late 1930s, the American public was largely pacifist and disinclined give attention the expansionist efforts of the growing totalitarian regimes in Germany, Italy, and Japan. Some citizens believed the causes of the Great Depression could be traced back the nation's involvement in World War I, and they felt that staying clear of all foreign problems was the way future security. President Franklin D. Roosevelt said nothing at all about foreign relations in his second inaugural address in 1937. But when France fell the German and Italian armies on May 10, 1940, and only Great Britain stood between Nazi Germany and the United States, the strong pacifism and comfortable isolationism of the American public began be shaken. When the President addressed a joint session of the Senate and House of Representatives on May 16, 1940, his frustration with the isolationist stance of the citizenry and the Congress became evident as he spoke of the growing European threat. He said: Let us measure our strength and our defense without self-delusion. The clear fact is that the American people must recast their thinking about national protection. (4) Roosevelt's impassioned speech finally convinced the reluctant Congress appropriate $2.5 billion for military equipment and installations. On September 6th, he took the additional step of signing into law the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, creating the country's first peacetime military draft. At the same time, the United States government began efforts raise citizens' awareness of the importance of national unity and foster concern about the nation's common welfare via broadcasts and publications; phrases such as sustain morale, mobilize pride and faith, enliven hope and devotion, strengthen loyalty, and develop a sense of belonging began be used in print and on the radio by the Office of National Defense and other agencies, as they sought raise public awareness of the threat of war. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Historical Research in Music EducationSame topicDiverse Music Education InsightsFrench-language works237,207